Comind.work vs Scilife

Both platforms serve mid-market life sciences companies. The key differences are implementation speed, tier gating, deployment options, and approach to quality engagement.

Company overview

Positioning

Comind.work

Complete QMS configured for your processes in 21 days

Scilife

Smart Quality Platform with gamification, learning, and analytics

Founded

Comind.work

2007

Scilife

2017 (Antwerp, Belgium; originally QbD Software)

Customers

Comind.work

Mid-market regulated companies

Scilife

Hundreds; logos include Novartis, Biocartis, Polpharma

Deployment

Comind.work

Self-hosted (on-prem or private cloud) or managed cloud

Scilife

Cloud SaaS (AWS)

Industry focus

Comind.work

Life sciences, medtech, pharma, biotech

Scilife

Pharma, biotech, medtech, cannabis, CROs, clinical labs

Target size

Comind.work

20-500 employees

Scilife

50-1,000 employees

Pricing model

Comind.work

Fixed project fee + annual license

Scilife

Tiered: Free / Essential / Core / Core+

Price range

Comind.work

$15K-$30K implementation

Scilife

$12-60K/year

Feature comparison

Core QMS modules

Document management

Comind.work
Scilife

Training management

Comind.work
Scilife

CAPA management

Comind.work
Scilife

Change control

Comind.work
Scilife

Audit management

Comind.work
Scilife

Supplier management

Comind.work
Scilife

Deviation/event management

Comind.work
Scilife

Complaint management

Comind.work
Scilife

Risk management

Comind.work
Scilife

Analytics and engagement

Advanced analytics Scilife offers real-time KPIs, predictive trends, and industry benchmarks

Comind.work Dashboards
Scilife

Gamification Unique to Scilife - leaderboards, quizzes, badges

Comind.work -
Scilife

Augmented learning Scilife Academy with videos, quizzes, and learning paths

Comind.work -
Scilife

Platform and deployment

On-premises deployment

Comind.work
Scilife -

Private cloud deployment

Comind.work
Scilife -

Managed cloud (SaaS)

Comind.work
Scilife

Platform extensibility Scilife is a fixed-feature platform

Comind.work
Scilife -

Full source code access

Comind.work
Scilife -

Transparent pricing Scilife shows tiers but exact prices require a sales call

Comind.work
Scilife Partially

Compliance and validation

21 CFR Part 11 compliance

Comind.work
Scilife

Pre-validated (GAMP 5) Scilife handles ~95% of validation activity

Comind.work Validation docs included
Scilife

Implementation

Implementation timeline

Comind.work 21 days
Scilife 90 days core, ~4 months full

All modules included

Comind.work
Scilife -

No per-user pricing

Comind.work
Scilife -

No vendor lock-in

Comind.work
Scilife -

Where Comind.work is different

What sets us apart

21 days vs 90+ days

Scilife's core go-live is 90 days, with full deployment taking around 4 months including hypercare. Comind.work delivers a working QMS in 21 days.

No tier gating

Scilife's tiered model forces upgrades to higher-priced tiers for specific features. Comind.work includes all modules at one price - no surprises when you need a feature that's locked behind a tier.

Self-hosted option

Scilife is cloud-only on AWS. Comind.work can run on your own infrastructure, private cloud, or managed cloud - giving you full data sovereignty.

Extensibility

Scilife is a fixed-feature platform. Comind.work's low-code architecture means you can build and configure what you need without waiting for the vendor roadmap.

Being honest

Where Scilife may be stronger

Gamification

Genuinely unique in QMS. Leaderboards, quizzes, badges, and scoring drive employee engagement with quality processes. No other vendor offers this - it can meaningfully improve quality culture adoption.

Advanced analytics

Real-time KPI dashboards, predictive trends, and industry benchmarks out of the box. Scilife's analytics capabilities are a genuine strength among mid-market QMS platforms.

Validation service

Scilife handles approximately 95% of GAMP 5 validation activity with three environments (test, validation, production). Strong trust builder for regulated companies.

Quality culture narrative

Born from QbD quality consultancy, Scilife's "Smart Quality" positioning resonates with quality leaders wanting culture change, not just compliance tools.

Frequently asked questions

How does Comind.work compare to Scilife's Smart Quality platform?
Both are QMS platforms for regulated life sciences. Scilife differentiates with gamification, augmented learning, and advanced analytics. Comind.work differentiates with deployment flexibility, implementation speed (21 days vs 90+ days), and all-inclusive pricing without tier gating.
Does Comind.work have analytics like Scilife?
Scilife's advanced analytics - including predictive trends and industry benchmarks - are a genuine strength. Comind.work includes quality KPI dashboards and reporting. For the latest on our analytics capabilities, talk to our team.
How long does implementation take vs Scilife?
Comind.work delivers a working QMS in 21 days. Scilife's core go-live is 90 days, with full deployment typically taking around 4 months including hypercare. Both include guided implementation support.
Does Comind.work support gamification for quality engagement?
No. Gamification is unique to Scilife and is a genuine differentiator. Comind.work focuses on making quality processes efficient and intuitive rather than gamified. If driving engagement through leaderboards and scoring is a priority, Scilife has a clear advantage here.
Does Comind.work handle validation like Scilife does?
Scilife handles approximately 95% of GAMP 5 validation activity on your behalf. Comind.work provides validation documentation as part of the 21-day implementation. The approaches differ - contact us to discuss which model fits your regulatory strategy.

Ready to compare in detail?

See how Comind.work works for your specific processes. A working QMS in 21 days - no tier upgrades, no 4-month timelines.