Comind.work vs SharePoint, Excel & paper

Many regulated companies start with SharePoint, Excel, and paper. They work - until an audit, a scaling team, or a regulatory requirement exposes the gaps. Here is where a dedicated eQMS is different.

How they compare

Purpose

Comind.work

Built for regulated quality management

SharePoint, Excel & paper

General-purpose document storage and collaboration

Compliance

Comind.work

21 CFR Part 11, ISO 13485, EU MDR built in

SharePoint, Excel & paper

Must be custom-configured and re-validated for every change

Audit trail

Comind.work

Automatic, tamper-proof, regulatory-grade

SharePoint, Excel & paper

Manual or absent; paper trails are reconstructable at best

Validation

Comind.work

Validation documentation included with implementation

SharePoint, Excel & paper

Customer must validate every configuration; no vendor support

Cost

Comind.work

Subscription includes compliance features

SharePoint, Excel & paper

"Free" upfront but hidden cost in consultant time, failed audits, manual processes

Feature comparison

Document and storage

Document storage

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper

Automated version control SharePoint has basic versioning; Excel and paper are manual

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper Basic

Electronic signatures (Part 11) Requires add-ons or manual process with generic tools

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Regulatory-grade audit trail SharePoint version history is limited; paper has none

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Quality management modules

Training management

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

CAPA management

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Change control

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Quality event management

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Supplier management

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Design controls

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Risk management

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Audit management

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Compliance and deployment

Regulatory compliance built in

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Pre-validated (GAMP 5) Customer must build and validate everything with generic tools

Comind.work Validation docs included
SharePoint, Excel & paper -

Cloud-based access SharePoint and Google Drive yes; paper no

Comind.work
SharePoint, Excel & paper Partially

Cost

Upfront cost

Comind.work Subscription
SharePoint, Excel & paper Free / included with Office 365

Compliance configuration cost

Comind.work Included
SharePoint, Excel & paper Significant consultant time

Where Comind.work is different

What sets us apart

Compliance by design

SharePoint, Excel, and paper were not built for regulated industries. Every compliance feature must be custom-configured, validated, and maintained. Comind.work has 21 CFR Part 11, audit trails, and e-signatures built in.

Audit readiness

Companies using generic tools spend weeks preparing for audits - gathering documents from folders, reconstructing training records, and manually proving traceability. Comind.work provides audit-ready dashboards and reports at the click of a button.

Hidden cost of "free"

SharePoint is free with Office 365, but the real cost is consultant time to configure compliance features, failed audit remediation, manual quality event tracking, and the risk of regulatory action. Most companies spend more making SharePoint compliant than they would on a purpose-built eQMS.

Single source of truth

Quality events, documents, training, suppliers, and CAPAs are siloed across separate spreadsheets and folders. Comind.work connects everything with traceability across all quality processes.

Being honest

Where SharePoint, Excel & paper may be stronger

Already in your stack

SharePoint comes free with Microsoft 365. Google Drive is free with Workspace. There is no new vendor to evaluate or onboard - the tools are already there.

Familiar to everyone

Every employee already knows how to use Excel, Word, and SharePoint. Zero learning curve for basic document management.

Flexibility

A spreadsheet can track anything. No pre-defined workflows or modules to learn. You design the system exactly how you want it.

Frequently asked questions

Can I pass an FDA audit using SharePoint and Excel?
Technically possible but extremely difficult and risky. You would need to custom-configure electronic signatures, audit trails, access controls, and validation - then maintain all of it through every change. Most companies that attempt this invest heavily in consultants and still face findings.
How much does it actually cost to make SharePoint GxP-compliant?
The hidden costs include: consultant time for compliance configuration ($50-150K+), validation of every custom workflow, ongoing re-validation after updates, manual audit preparation, and the risk cost of regulatory findings. Most companies underestimate the true cost by 3-5x.
When should I switch from spreadsheets to a dedicated QMS?
Common triggers: preparing for your first regulatory audit, investor due diligence requiring quality system evidence, scaling beyond 10-15 people managing quality processes, or a regulatory requirement that generic tools cannot satisfy without heavy customization.
Can I migrate my existing documents from SharePoint to Comind.work?
Yes. Comind.work supports data migration from SharePoint and other document management systems as part of the 21-day implementation. Your existing documents, templates, and folder structures can be imported.
Is Comind.work harder to learn than Excel?
Excel is universally familiar - that is a genuine advantage. Comind.work is designed for quality professionals and the learning curve is modest, but it is not zero. The trade-off is a short learning period in exchange for built-in compliance, audit trails, and connected quality processes.

Ready to move beyond spreadsheets?

Comind.work replaces your SharePoint folders, Excel trackers, and paper forms with a complete eQMS - configured for your processes in 21 days.